Showing posts with label Les Miserables. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Les Miserables. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

TRAILER : 'The Wolverine'


As promised, the highly anticipated first trailer to The Wolverine went online today. Set after the X-Men films, the second solo adventure for Hugh Jackman's mutant takes him to Japan searching for mortality, while dealing with ghosts from his past (which includes Famke Jennsen's Jean Grey).

The Wolverine claws its way into 3D theaters on July 27th.

Check out the international version below.



The domestic trailer offers a slightly different look.





Monday, March 25, 2013

New Posters and Images From 'The Wolverine' Show Off Logan's Claws & Co-Stars

While we anxiously await the first trailer to hit on Wednesday, courtesy of Entertainment Weekly and ComingSoon.net, new posters and movie images from the The Wolverine have hit the web. In addiotn to new glimpes of Hugh Jackman as the popular Marvel Mutant, we are given the first official looks at his female co-stars Yukio (Rila Fukushima), Mariko (Tao Okamoto) and Viper (Svetlana Khodchenkova).

Directed by James Mangold, (3:10 To Yuma), The Wolverine is set to hit theaters in 3D on July 26th.










"Based on the celebrated comic book arc, this epic action-adventure takes Wolverine, the most iconic character of the X-Men universe, to modern day Japan. Out of his depth in an unknown world he faces his ultimate nemesis in a life-or-death battle that will leave him forever changed. Vulnerable for the first time and pushed to his physical and emotional limits, he confronts not only lethal samurai steel but also his inner struggle against his own immortality, emerging more powerful than we have ever seen him before."



Monday, December 24, 2012

Film Review - LES MISÉRABLES ★★☆☆☆

The characters suffer, and unfortunately so does the audience in the high profile adaptation of the long running stage musical based on Victor's Hugo's 1862 epic novel set in 19th century France.

Brought to the big screen by Tom Hooper, the Academy Award Winning director of The King's SpeechLes Misérables stars Wolverine, Maximus, Catwoman and Borat, is aimed directly at its target audience, and there is nothing wrong with that. Fans will marvel, sing along, applaud and weep with reckless abandon in all the right places, but musical civillians may find themselves crying for a whole different set of reasons. The film is a hit and miss on many levels.

A dreary gritty film set for a timely release on Christmas Day, at risk of sounding like Saturday Night Live's Stefon, "this film has everything": death, depression, broken dreams, prostitution, filth, betrayal, lost love, redemption and singing. Lots and lots of singing. Everyone sings every single word. So if off the bat, sitting through a movie that runs nearly three hours and boasts not one line of spoken dialogue to move the plot forward is not your thing, you may as well stop reading here.

If you are familiar with the story, you already know there is a rather high body count, save for Hugh Jackman (Jean Valjean) and Russell Crowe (Javert), meaning many of these stars listed above and below the title do not actually clock in a substantial amount of screen time. Don't grow too comfy to the cast, happy endings isn't one of the production's strengths.

Jackman was born to lead this cast as Jean Valjean, the iconic Prisoner Number 24601. The Aussie superstar and jack of all trades shines here among the cast (who all sang live on set during filming, no easy task). I don't think anyone blinked an eye when he was cast in the role, given his proven range in both drama and stage work. He does not disappoint as the film's anchor.

As the police hound who relentlessly pursues Valjean for decades after  breaking parole, Crowe effortless exudes the part snarling with a cold military stature as the vengeful Javert. But it's when Crowe sings the part it takes a turn for the worse. His low limited range is painfully outdone by his other cast mates who all seem to have more relavent experience singing on stage and in film. It makes you wonder if even this summer's hair metal homage Rock of Ages would have had a place for him where you are at least allowed to chuckle over the content. Crowe is probably the greatest casualty of performing live on set rather than mime to perfect vocals recorded in the safety of a studio.

There is nothing to take away from Hathaway here. Her turn as the doomed former factory worker turned prostitute Fantine will win her well deserved gold during awards season. Her "I Dreamed A Dream" performance, shot in a single long take, won't earn any 'feel good' points, but is without question the darkest and the moving highlight of the film. Hooper effectively captured this song as a single take in a medium to close-up shot that builds emotion as you immerse yourself in the performance. Hathaway takes the number to tears by its end, and Hooper's eye here is without question successful to capture every painful nuance.

However, by the fourth time the director goes back to that well, choosing to shoot number after number the same exact way, the visuals loses their emotional punch upon repetition and effectively takes away from Hathaway's well deserved spotlight, especially late in the third act when you realize at least the stage production allows you an intermission.

Singing live has its strengths and weaknesses. It allows the cast to really act and react to their environment on the set and, and relieves them of hitting pre-recored musical cues. But what we see on screen here countless times are (well orchestrated) complete single takes from a master shot with few, if any, cutaways. I find that tends to get visually repetitive when the shot composition is repeated over and over. But that's me dissecting this as a movie buff, not a musical fan.

As the tragically poor Éponine, stunning British newcomer Samantha Barks steals the second half of the show with her standout rain-soaked rendition of "On My Own." Yes, shot in one take like many others, but as an unfamiliar face to moviegoers and having the strongest stage-trained voice in the cast (she played the role in the London production as well), she truly makes the part her own. The notion that Taylor Swift or Glee's Lea Michele were in early contention for the role is beyond baffling.

If the film allows us anytime to breath and enjoy a laugh, thankfully there are Sacha Baron Cohen and Helena Bonham Carter, who as the greedy innkeepers the Thénardiers, bring the place down with their welcome rousing rendition of "Master of the House." You are so beaten into a drained depression since scene one, minute one of the film, the opportunity to enjoy a lighthearted number is more than necessary. The duo deliver much needed glee to an otherwise emotionally exhausting experience.

Amanda Seyfried holds her own as Cosette, the grown up illegitimate daughter of Fantine now in the care of the elder Jean Valjean (got that?). Cosette was placed in the care of the Thénardiers as a child, and grew up with their daughter Éponine (still with me?). Surprisingly Seyfried has scant screen time in this epic, serving mainly an object to be fawned over by Marius (Eddie Redmayne), the singing hunk who turns a blind eye to Éponine's unbathed adoration.

Not every musical translates well as a screenplay, especially when the movie then must entirely rely on all exposition to be conveyed through song, leading some parts to come off like, for lack of a better term, a cheesy musical. Characters can fall in love after a sole dreamy gaze from across the stage, but that's a lot harder to make seem credible on the big screen. And you do have to question that why Javert really didn't have bigger career criminals to obsess over in life than to dedicate decades to hunting down a man convicted of stealing a piece of bread for his sister's starving child. Additionally, while some set pieces come across as sweeping and lavish, others add imagery no more convincing than the Seinfeld NYC street backlot.

Overall, I had a tough time with it, at this point in my review that is painfully obvious. Am I the target demo for Les Misérables? No. Do I feel fans and purists of the musical will be pleased? Yes. My screening in NYC had fans who reacted just as they should have, and just as the filmmakers wanted. But I know as many folks who felt as I did, like a caged animal eyeballing the seconds hand of their watches. However, I also know which friends not to recommend the likes of The Hobbit, Prometheus or Cloud Atlas to.

I surely can admire its strengths, and genuinely enjoy the solid work from most of the cast. But overall with its painfully generous length, excessive use of one-take close-ups, overdone production and numerous missteps in leaping from stage to screen, given the choice I would sooner gladly re-visit Rob Marshall's Chicago, a slick stunning big screen musical that managed to get it right.



Les Misérables opens in theaters on December 25th.

REVIEW RATING:  ★★☆☆☆
Directed By: Tom Hooper
Starring: Hugh Jackman, Russell Crowe, Anne Hathaway, Amanda Seyfried and Sacha Baron Cohen
Studio: Universal Pictures
Rated: PG-13
Running Time: 157 minutes



Monday, December 10, 2012

Why Russell Crowe Really Turned Down Wolverine: He's Not Into Cartoons

It's become quite the water cooler geek topic over the past few weeks regarding the news that Russell Crowe turned down the opportunity to play Wolverine in 2000's X-Men, leading the way for Hugh Jackman's rise to fame in the role.

In this interview with Access Hollywood's Michelle Beadle at the NYC press junket for Les Misérables, Crowe dishes on why taking the part of the popular Marvel Mutant was not right for him at the time, having just come off of Gladiator. Crowe apparently felt the characters were too similar, and apparently suggested to director Bryan Singer that he take a look at his friend and fellow Aussie Hugh Jackman. And we know how that all turned out.

But what has been predominantly absent in most of these recent reports is where Scottish actor Dougray Scott fits into all this. Scott was initially set to play Wolverine, but was unable to make the start date for X-Men in 1999 when he had to honor his commitment to playing the main villain in John Woo's Mission: Impossible II, which ran weeks over its shooting schedule. Jackman was then cast as Wolverine shortly before filming began. Where in this timeline Crowe's presence in relation to Scott's remains to be revealed.

Whether you think Wolverine was too similar to Maximus or not, take note how Crowe dismounts off the topic in the video by dismissing the whole X-Men deal as "it's a cartoon. I'm not really into those."

In twelve years time, Crowe must have re-considered his views regarding said "cartoons," signing on to play Superman's dad Jor-El in the upcoming Man of Steel. But hey, if the role was good enough for Brando, it should be good enough for Crowe, right?


Hugh Jackman In Talks For 'X-Men: Days of Future Past' & Confirms Crowe's Past Wolverine Casting

I'm a bit late to the party here, but nonetheless check out this Access Hollywood interview with Hugh Jackman, where he explains to Michelle Beadle how his old friend Russell Crowe's disinterest in the role of Wolverine changed his life forever.

Sure the story has been circling the web for the past few weeks now, but what has been predominantly absent in most of these recent reports is where Scottish actor Dougray Scott fits into all this.

Scott was initially set to play Wolverine, but was unable to make the start date for X-Men in 1999 and honor his commitment to John Woo's Mission: Impossible II, which ran weeks over its initial production schedule. Director Bryan Singer was forced to re-cast the role and Jackman stepped in shortly before filming commenced. Where in this casting timeline Crowe actually lies in remains to be revealed.

While in New York City to talk up Les Misérables, Jackman also reveals he is in talks with Bryan Singer to appear in X-Men: Days of Future Past. But if there is no one more gung-ho for the big screen X-Men franchise than Jackman. Frankly, it would be more surprising if he didn't take part in it.




Anne Hathaway Already Shedding Tears Thinking About Selina Kyle, And Knows Nothing About A 'Catwoman' Spin-Off

So this has been picked up many times over by now, but I can see this as something remaining of online interest until this Catwoman spin-off film is finally confirmed to never happen.

In the video below, Anne Hathaway chats with Access Hollywood's Michelle Beadle more on how she dearly misses her Selina Kyle character from The Dark Knight Rises than any spin-off updates from the film.

“No one’s talked to me about it,” the 2008 Oscar Nominee said about returning to the big screen as Selina Kyle (who was never actually referred to as Catwoman).

"I was at a press Q & A thing the other night for a screening of The Dark Knight, and the moderator asked me, ‘So what was it like to say goodbye to the character?’ And I burst into tears, because I miss her,” she said.

“It just makes me cry. I miss her. I love Selina so much and I love her presence in my life and getting to… I’m crying again.”

“So assuming there was enough Kleenex in the world, I would love to do a spin-off.”